***
When my writing partner,
Camille Picott, suggested the topic of Book
Bloat for a
guest post, I had to smile since it is something I have come to feel very
passionate about.
When I was a young reader—way
back in the day when Netflix, Wii, smartphones, Facebook, and Twitter were just
thoughts that no one believed could ever come true—I didn’t have strong
feelings about book bloat. I read Stephen King’s The
Stand (the
edited version), The Lord of the Rings, and the entire eight book
historical romance series, Angelique, by Sergeanne Golon without
batting an eye.
Somewhere along the way, the
world changed, and I changed with it.
I can pinpoint four specific
events over the past five years that have contributed to my personal vow as an
author to not ever publish book bloat.
What is book bloat? Are all
fat books bloated books? For sure, it is a matter of taste. However, if your
aesthetic preferences tend toward well-crafted minimalism and “less is more,”
then you might find that book bloat is a rather common, accepted—and even
revered—phenomenon.
Some readers believe: the
bigger the better. The more words, the harder the author wrote. I am not
convinced. Let’s face it, if you are a writer, you tend toward the verbose, and
lots of words aren’t really that hard to come by. What’s really hard is
choosing. What is necessary? What isn’t? What works? What doesn’t? What is
self-indulgent? What is lazy?
So let’s get back to the four
specific events that shaped my current book bloat worldview.
In January of 2009, I
attended the San Diego State University Writer’s Conference and stumbled into a
break-out session on Point of View.
Boy, was I baffled. Even
though I had read many novels, tried to write several in the privacy of my
home, had taken two courses on writing at two community colleges, and had the
minimal English Literature credits to graduate from college with an
undergraduate business degree, I had never heard of Point of View.
I pretty much felt like an
idiot, because everyone else in the room seemed to know what the guy standing
in the front of the room was talking about.
After the session, I sidled
up to the table where they sold the writing books and searched for the one the
presenter had recommended, Character &
Viewpoint by
Orson Scott Card. I went home and inhaled it. It sort of made sense. It dawned
on me that the brilliant 138,000K-word novel that I’d been pitching at the
conference had no clear POV. It would have been a stretch to call it
omniscient, because there really is a difference between omniscient and no
POV…something called intention, I believe.
I was stumped. I was
mystified. I was red-faced. My great novel wasn’t really that great. And it was
out-dated. Very. I began researching POV. There wasn’t tons of information on
it, and it was hard for me to grasp. I stumbled upon the book Mastering
Point of View by
Sherri Szeman and ordered it from, where else, Amazon.
Wasn’t going to walk into the
local bookstore and find that one on the shelf…
Mastering
Point of View
was a fascinating read, not only because it started to help me comprehend POV,
but it also gave me an entirely new way to look at the novel. Appendix
A: Historical Overview and Development of Point of View in Literary Fiction taught me that the novel is
a living art form.
I had never looked at it that
way before. As someone who dabbled in painting and music, I understood how
powerful this way of looking at the novel could be. It meant that the novel—as
a living art form—had changed and would continue to change forever.
Although I didn’t know it at
the time, that was the first event that would shape my current book bloat view.
The second event was reading
Dead Until Dark
by Charlaine Harris. Wow. I hadn’t been reading much contemporary fantasy and
boy, it had changed since the days of Tolkien, Lewis, and Rice. I loved The
Lord of the Rings,
The
Chronicles of Narnia, and Lestat’s gothic vampirism, but the sheer brilliance and fun of
Dead Until Dark
possessed me. Reading it had been like opening a box of chocolates and eating
every last one, without the stomachache. Lestat had been turned on his head,
and it wasn’t because there was no coffin in sight.
I decided I wanted to do for
the epic fantasy what Charlaine Harris had done for vampires everywhere.
Modest, I know. I turned a cold, hard eye to my great epic fantasy, The
End of the Enchantment, and began revising. I managed to rewrite the whole thing into a first
person, less-epic fantasy novel, A Faerie’s
Quest. Better,
but I was now reading lots of contemporary fantasy novels and I knew it wasn’t
quite right.
The third event happened when
I got a Nook for Valentine’s Day 2010. I began reading more than ever, fell in
love with my Nook, and apparently fell out of love with book bloat forever.
I am not sure what it is
about the digital reading experience, but it’s something like this…if the story
isn’t holding your attention, your mind wanders. And nine times out of ten, if
you’re reading and you’re mind is wandering, unless you are in the midst of a
personal crisis or someone is interrupting you, you’ve probably encountered
book bloat.
I am not convinced it is as
noticeable on the printed page…
I proceeded with the third
major revision of my great epic fantasy. This time I called it Half-Faerie and workshopped it through
an online critique group. Along the way, I discovered Twitter, Amanda Hocking,
and the idea of self-publishing.
Something exploded inside me.
I am someone who has been
hesitant in life. Kelly Clarkson’s duet with Reba McEntire, Because
of You, kind of
sums up my sense of personal boundaries. Caution has been the rule. But I was
not getting any younger, and to say that I believed in my story was an
understatement. Besides, self-publishing sounded fun.
I began seeking out works by
self-published authors and found something refreshing. I couldn’t put my finger
on it, but I didn’t need any more convincing.
The next decision was: Who
was I going to be as an author? Answering that question became the fourth event
steering me away from book bloat forever.
There was no doubt I wanted
to write fantasy, but how to approach a long-term career?
I decided, when readers
thought of the author, Heidi Garrett, I wanted them to know they would get a
well-told, well-structured story, with interesting characters, in a setting
they wanted to visit. I didn’t want them to slog through pages of description,
or go down the rabbit hole of convoluted plot points. If there was a deep,
esoteric message buried in the story, great, but I wanted the reading to be
easy and fun. So, with an eye on preventing book bloat, I decided each of my
books would be limited to 70K words, with 50K to 70K as the target.
Why would I do such a thing?
Because limits in art—whether
it’s a limited number of colors on a painting or a limited number of chord
changes on a pop song—forces the artist to make hard choices. It requires the
creative self to get down to the basics, the core…and sometimes, simple is just
the best magic there is.
I am right there with you on the issue of book bloat. I finally convinced myself to read LOTR and then promptly fell asleep during chapter 1. If a book does that to you, there is something definitely wrong. I always think about it this way: times have changed and people lead busier lives. Reading a 600+ page book isn't doable anymore. Especially one where half the words don't need to be there. Good writers should be able to tell the same story in less words.
ReplyDelete@ Lan & Heidi -- I've always been embarassed to admit that I never cared for LOTR. I read the Hobbit, but never made it through any of the others.
DeleteLan, I went back and tried to read LOTR last year, too:) When it took 25 pages to get from Elrond to Moria, I admit, I gave up. And I remember being ENTHRALLED by LOTR the first time I read it as a teenager! Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
ReplyDeleteCamille, thank you for giving me the opportunity to write a guest post for your wonderful blog. And thank you for helping me to pick out a topic that I really believe in and ended up enjoying writing about!
ReplyDeleteThis is perfect! I have these exact same beliefs about book bloat. That's a very cool term, by the way. I'm so tired of books that dawdle and take forever to get to the point, or the beginning of the actual story. I lead a busy life full of fatigue and just don't need my books to add to my fatigue and take up time I don't have.
ReplyDeleteAs a writer, I too believe in getting to the point--cutting to the chase. I don't need long descriptions of things I can easily picture in my head already. A sword is a normal sword unless it's 10 feet tall and shoots flames out of its tip. Even then, that's all the more description I need of such a sword.
This is why I write very short fiction. Because I don't NEED to write long fiction. More often than not, no author actually does.
Cathy, EXACTLY! What your wrote about the sword is such a perfect example!
DeleteI had no idea about book bloat but I totally know what you're talking about. I find my mind wandering a lot in books. I think we do live in a world where people just don't have time for pointless things in books. (sad as that may be) Interesting post! :)
ReplyDeleteGreat post Heidi! I just finished my prologue to my WIP and you have me thinking about book bloat now :-\ uh oh!
ReplyDeleteJenny and Chelemybelles, thank you for stopping by:) I am glad you enjoyed reading some thoughts about Book Bloat:)
ReplyDelete